Birth control pills became legal for unmarried women in 1972, the year I lost my virginity. I realized this last night as I was reading a new book called The Baby Matrix, written by Laura Carroll, who also wrote Families of Two. I’ll write more about this book when I finish reading it, but the section on birth control is the most complete I’ve ever seen. I was shocked when I suddenly understood the chronology. In the 1960s, birth control became legal for married couples, but it wasn’t until I was in college that women who were not married had an effective means, aside from abstinence, to prevent unwanted pregnancies. This blows my mind.
I was a late bloomer when it comes to dating and sex. My mother
said “don’t” and I didn’t until I was 20. It was only when I met the man who
became my first husband that I finally learned how much fun sex could be. The
first few months that were dated, he kept pressuring me to “do it.” I knew that
he’d dump me pretty soon if I kept saying no. After I finally gave in, he
hustled me to the San Jose State
University health center, where I
got my first birth control prescription. The pills made me sick and fat, but
they kept me from getting pregnant. After we got married, I switched to a diaphragm,
a rubber disk full of spermicidal cream that I inserted just before
intercourse. That’s what I used until several years after our divorce, when I
met Fred, who had had a vasectomy. With him, I no longer needed birth control.
Conception was impossible.
I got those first pills in 1972, hiding them so my parents
would never know. A year earlier, the pills would not have been available. Nor
would the diaphragm. We might have used condoms, but the chances were good that
I would have joined the many women who are pregnant on their wedding day. In
the old days, lots of women got married to men they might not otherwise have
married simply because they were pregnant. To have a child outside of marriage
was a scandal to be avoided. God help the unmarried pregnant woman and her
illegitimate child.
Today, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , 40.8 percent of babies
born in the U.S.
are born to unmarried women. Today they have a choice, and they choose to
become single mothers while their sisters may decide not to become mothers at
all. But before I was 20 years old, we didn’t have these choices. Even then, it took a while for attitudes to catch up with legalities.
Without birth control, it would be a lot harder to choose a
life without children unless you also chose a life without intercourse. It
would also be a considerably more difficult for a spouse who doesn’t want
children to keep from having them anyway. Many of us who are childless by
marriage would not be if this were 1963 instead of 2013.
Makes you think, doesn’t it?
2 comments:
Without rights to birth control, it would also be considerably more difficult for women to choose to have a career. There are a lot of single moms out there, but there are also a lot of dual income households. I vaguely recall reading that there are now more female heads of household (primary breadwinners) than male. This could be due to single-parent situations, but there is no doubt that birth control has changed the economic landscape. Without it, I think the level of poverty, and the number of children living in poverty in this country would be devastating.
Anon, I think you're right. Without birth control, it would be much harder to have a career. I've thought about that in my own situation. Not having children allowed me to go to college and to be a newspaper reporter and editor when I got divorced. If I had had children to care for, how would I have done any of that?
Post a Comment